The Fourteenth Banker Blog

May 7, 2010

The Community Reinvestment Act

Filed under: Uncategorized — thefourteenthbanker @ 12:58 PM

This post could also be entitled, “How to solve a regulatory problem and make more money”.    In the 1980s through mid 1990 there was an effort at big banks to comply with the spirit if the Community Reinvestment Act.    It was talked about.   Data was produced and distributed to field personnel.   There were goals to make loans in low to moderate income census tracts.  Loans make by real people, familiar with the market, with real customization in an effort to meet the spirit of the regulation.   There were plenty of people responsible for CRA compliance.  Then someone came up with a solution.  It was just too hard to try to make these loans locally.  We needed a factory approach to get the volumes up.  It also happened that credit card micro marketing by zip code came into vogue.   Computers could tell us what to do.   Sub Prime loans were perfect.  We could pump the credit into these areas and dump the risk into securitization pools.

The data stopped flowing to the local market.  No one was asked to try to make loans in these areas.  CRA officer positions disappeared. The very term “CRA” was never even mentioned again. I have not heard the term CRA mentioned in ten years.

Someone should do a study.  Is there any regulator out there that reads this blog?   Is there anyone else that can shed light on what happened?   I was not in the room, so I can only presume.  Some report high in the organization was produced for the regulators and it showed that we not only met, we greatly exceeded our CRA goals.  We were supporting this community, from which we draw deposits and fee income.    Big fee income.  Acquisitions would not be held up by community groups because the data was on our side.   Massive lending into the LMI community.   Problem solved.

How will we solve the new regulation problem and make money?

Advertisements

4 Comments »

  1. “Community Development Loans originated or purchased by a consortium or by third parties in which the institution participates or has invested will be considered as part of the lending to LMI test”

    Does that at least partially answer your question?

    These are the loopholes that lobbyists today are feverishly trying to acheive.

    Comment by Vocalbanker — May 7, 2010 @ 4:50 PM | Reply

  2. Every vehicle loan, home equity loan, Secured and unsecured loan made to individuals within the “assessed area” (black, Hispanic, other low to modrate income zip codes, you get the picture) counts towards CRA credit.

    First practice predatory lending, then package and sell off the junk, make money doing both and get CRA credit! Get the picture?

    Rules are made to be broken! Good luck Senators, a) you’re not doing enough, b) whatever you do, our voracious appetites for power and money AT ALL COSTS will find a way around it.

    Comment by Vocalbanker — May 7, 2010 @ 5:02 PM | Reply

  3. Great web-site, exactly where did you obtain the design?

    Comment by MikyxGbs9 — May 10, 2010 @ 11:44 PM | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.